The backlash against image and video synthesis does not only focus on creative application developers. Material manufacturer Wacom and game editor Sorcerers of the coast Faced with criticism and have issued apologies after using content generated by AI in their marketing equipment. Toys “R” also faced a negative reaction After launching an advertisement generated by AI. Companies are still struggling with the balance of the potential advantages of generative AI with the ethical concerns it raises.
Artists and criticisms react
Until now, ProSeat’s anti-Ai-Aui announcement has encountered a largely positive reaction in responses to its article on social networks. In a very loved comment, the artist Freya Holmér wrote On X, “it’s much appreciated, thank you.”
Some of the most frank adversaries in the image synthesis also responded favorably to the Procreat movement. Karla Ortiz, which is a The applicant in a trial Against IA image generator societies, replied To procreate the video on X, “everything you need at any time, know that I am here !! The artists support you mutually, and also support those who allow us to continue doing what we do! So thank you for everything you do all and so excited to see what the team then does!”
RJ Palmer artist, who delighted The first major wave of AI art reaction with a viral tweet in 2022, also replied In Cuda’s video declaration, saying: “Now it’s the way to send a message. Now, if only you could get a complete power competitor (Photoshop) on the desk with the plugin support. Until someone can build a real competitor at a high level (Photoshop), I am stuck with it. ”
Some pro-Ai users also responded to X Post, including the AI-increase artist Claire Silver, who uses AI generative as a tool for accessibility. She wrote On X, “most of my first works are done with a combination of AI and procreation. 7 years ago, before the text in the image was really one thing. I loved Procreer because it used technology to increase accessibility. Like AI, it increased commercial competence to allow more people to create. No rules, only tools.”
Since the synthesis of image of AI continues to be a very busy subject among certain artists, the reaffirmation of support for man centered on man could be an effectiveness differentiated marketing Move for Procretate, who currently plays an outsider to the Application of Creativity Application. While some may prefer to use AI tools, in an application ecosystem (ideally healthy) with a personal choice in illustration applications, people can follow their conscience.
The anti -Ai -Au Du procreate position is slightly risky, as it could also polarize part of its user base – and if the company changes its opinion on the inclusion of the generator in the future, it will have to resume its commitment. But for the moment, Procreat is confident in his decision: “In this technological rush, this could make us an exception or a risk of being left behind”, Procreat wrote. “But we see this route less traveled as the most exciting and fruitful for our community.”
This story originally appeared on Ars Technica.