With the latest iOS update (18.4), you will no longer need to read countless reviews before deciding to download an application. Instead, you will be able to simply read the summary of the revision generated by AI for this application before taking the plunge.
Apple begins to summarize the reviews using AI
Anyone who bought anything from Amazon regularly (and it is surely everyone who read this) will be aware of the examination of examination generated by AI. They are seated at the top of the criticism stack offering a summary, avoiding you to read criticisms in full.
Related
And now, with the release of iOS 18.4 and iPados 18.4, Apple follows the traces of Amazon. The revision summaries of the App Store are one of the many new features described on Apple developer website (as first identified by Macworld).
As you can see on the example of Apple below, the summaries of the revision will try to summarize people’s feelings about an application in a single paragraph using natural language. They should also highlight what people have written in positive and negative criticism.
The Apple App Store Revision Summaries are generated using large -language models (LLM). The summaries will be refreshed at least once a week for the applications that have collected enough reviews to justify the supply of a summary.
Apple’s examination summaries are currently only available for beta-testers in English in the United States on a limited number of applications and games. However, all being good, they will become available for more people when iOS 18.4 will be generally in April. Then develop even further in 2025.
The most common use for AI at the moment is probably to feed a LLM a lot of information, then summarize this information. So, in this spirit, it is not surprising to see Apple use AI in this way. Essentially, it is a low fruit in the world of AI; Easy to design and with obvious and real advantages for users.
Related
The summaries of the AI examination seem easy to play
The biggest problem with the examination of examination generated by AI is the ease with which they can be played. To be fair, all criticisms can be judged to a certain extent, with unscrupulous applicators using robots or paid shills to rent their products.
However, given that these revision summaries generated by the AI will take up the most common remarks, the additional system of playing the system is clear. Especially if they discourage people from reading detailed criticism (which may include more warnings and negative comments).