As with its other announcements in the 50 series, NVIDIA relies on its DLSS multi -trame generation technology to make high performance claims – GPUs can insert up to three frames interpolated at AI between each pair of images that the GPU really makes. The 40 series could generate only one framework, and the GPUs of the 30 series and the oldest do not take the generation of DLSS. This makes apple apple performance comparisons difficult.
Generally, the company claims that the 5060 TI and 5060 offer double the performance of the 4060 TI and 4060, but all its benchmarks are manufactured using the “level of generation of maximum frame supported by each GPU”. Small extracts of information on the native performance that we have—Hogwarts heritage Performs on a 5060 TI at 61 IPS 1440p, against 34 IPS for the 3060 TI – suggests that it is a little less than twice as fast as this two -generation old card. It would always be reasonably impressive, given the 3060s TI disappointing. But we have to wait for third -party tests before we really have a good idea of how the performances rub shoulders without allowing the generation of frame.
Nvidia makes high performance claims on the 5060 TI and the 5060, but all these figures allow a multi-trames generation for the 50-series cards and not for the oldest (because they do not support functionality).
Nvidia
Nvidia makes high performance claims on the 5060 TI and the 5060, but all these figures allow a multi-trames generation for the 50-series cards and not for the oldest (because they do not support functionality).
Nvidia
Similar numbers for the 5060. Nvidia claims that performance doubled compared to 4060, but take this with a brick of salt.
Nvidia
Similar numbers for the 5060. Nvidia claims that performance doubled compared to 4060, but take this with a brick of salt.
Nvidia
Nvidia makes high performance claims on the 5060 TI and the 5060, but all these figures allow a multi-trames generation for the 50-series cards and not for the oldest (because they do not support functionality).
Nvidia
Similar numbers for the 5060. Nvidia claims that performance doubled compared to 4060, but take this with a brick of salt.
Nvidia
The numbers of performance compatible with the image here make generational comparisons of apple with apple to make.
Nvidia
The numbers of performance compatible with the image here make generational comparisons of apple with apple to make.
Nvidia
One of the only concrete references to the frequency of native images of the 5060 Ti. This suggests that the 5060 TI will be slightly less than twice as fast than the 3060 Ti.
Nvidia
One of the only concrete references to the frequency of native images of the 5060 Ti. This suggests that the 5060 TI will be slightly less than twice as fast than the 3060 Ti.
Nvidia
The numbers of performance compatible with the image here make generational comparisons of apple with apple to make.
Nvidia
One of the only concrete references to the frequency of native images of the 5060 Ti. This suggests that the 5060 TI will be slightly less than twice as fast than the 3060 Ti.
Nvidia
As we and others have observed it since the launch of the 40 series a few years ago, the generation of frame gives the best results when your base of basic images is already quite high; Technology is better used to improve a good image frequency and is less useful if you try to make a bad image frequency well. It is even more relevant for the 50 slower 50 series than for other GPUs in the range, which makes Nvidia’s reluctance to provide particularly frustrating native performance comparisons.
Rumors of earlier this year that correctly reported the specifications of the 5060 series also indicated that Nvidia was plans to launch a low -end RTX 5050 GPU At one point, its first new entry -level GPU since the launch of the RTX 3050 in January 2022. The 5050 could still arrive, but if this is the case, it was not part of Nvidia’s announcements today.