Openai CEO Sam Altman defended the art of AI in the midst of the images of Ghibli generated by Ai-Generated Ghibli created using Chatgpt, which described him as “net victory” for the company.
On a YouTube podcast organized by an Indian entrepreneur, Altman defended the social impact of technology, saying: “I think that the democratization of content creation was a great net victory for the company. This is not a complete victory, there are negative things at that time, and he certainly did something about the art form, but I think that on the whole, it is a victory, “he said.
The trend triggered the indignation of fans of the Japanese animation studio Ghibli after the GPT-4O model of Chatgpt introduced the generation of native images. Critics have accused the characteristic of copying styles and raised concerns about the exploitation of original art.
Altman has recognized the IA job losses and said: “This does not mean that it does not cause a job loss, and some people who had a kind of differential capacity to do something now have much more competition. But overall, I think it is a real advantage for society. ”
He stressed how weaker technological barriers have enabled innovation, saying that OpenAi himself was the product of these changes. “Openai … did not occur because the obstacles to entry into a bunch of different pieces of technological piles have become clearly low and that this pile of Ragtag was able to do something that we were not allowed to do.”
He also noted the growing presence of India AI: “India was one of the first markets outside the United States that really jumped on AI in a huge and enormous way … It is now our fastest market.”
On the impact of AI’s work, he said: “There will be jobs that will disappear completely … Above all, I think this will be the case with a new tool where people are simply more productive and can work on superior quality.” In coding, he said that AI could make the coders “10 times more productive”, although this can also affect the price of the code due to the higher offer.
Altman concluded that the wider accessibility of creative tools would ultimately help society, even if the transition is mater.